SAP_B1MANUFACTURING2025

Case study

Product costing the shop floor actually recognises

Standard costs that had drifted for years rebuilt against real routings and consumption, with shop-floor capture on rugged terminals and variance reported per production order.

Client
Multi-plant engineering manufacturer
Profile
Two plants · discrete manufacturing · 600 staff
Duration
20 weeks
Services
SAP Business One · Process Reengineering · Power BI · GRC & SoD
99%+Inventory accuracy, from 82%
6hrsFloor-to-ledger lag, from 2 days
11ptsMargin variance explained

01 — CHALLENGE

What was actually broken

The company knew its total cost of production and almost nothing about its composition. Quotations were being priced from standard costs last reviewed three years earlier.

  • Production, scrap and downtime were recorded on paper and keyed in a shift or two later, so work-in-progress was always an estimate.
  • Standard costs had not been rolled up since the previous ERP; actual material usage was reconciled only at year-end stock count.
  • Inventory accuracy sat at 82%, with adjustments posted at month-end to force agreement.
  • The same person could create a vendor, raise a purchase order and approve the payment.

02 — APPROACH

The sequence we used

Process first, capture second, costing third — in that order, because a costing model built on unreliable capture is a more precise wrong answer.

01

Observed process mapping

Four weeks shadowing both plants across all shifts to record the real flow of material, paperwork and approval — including the workarounds that existed because the designed process did not fit the floor.

02

Capture redesign

Reporting points reduced from fourteen to six, each placed where material physically changes custody, with rugged terminals and barcode scanning that buffer locally when the plant network drops.

03

BOM and routing rebuild

Multi-level bills of material and routings rebuilt with production supervisors, including scrap factors and setup times measured rather than assumed.

04

Costing and variance model

Standard cost roll-up with actual capture, and purchase-price, usage and efficiency variance reported per production order — reviewed monthly by plant management, not only by finance.

05

Role and SoD remediation

A segregation-of-duties matrix mapped to actual Business One permissions, conflicts removed, and compensating controls documented where headcount made full separation impractical.

03 — RESULT

Where it landed

Costing is now a management tool rather than a year-end reconstruction, and the floor reports into the ledger the same day.

  • Inventory accuracy sustained above 99% across both plants for three consecutive quarters.
  • Floor-to-ledger reporting lag reduced from around two days to under six hours.
  • Eleven points of previously unexplained margin variance traced to specific routings, scrap rates and purchase-price movements.
  • Quotations now priced from current costed BOMs, with a documented review cycle.
  • All identified segregation-of-duties conflicts closed at permission level ahead of the annual audit.
Our board finally reads the same numbers we do. Month-end reporting dropped from eleven working days to four, and nobody rebuilds a spreadsheet to get there.
IT Director · Multi-plant engineering manufacturer

Next step

We would rather show you the working than the summary

Ask for the blueprint structure, the migration reconciliation approach, or a reference call with a client in your sector.

WhatsApp